I became uncomfortable the other evening, just after Wilhelm left my study, when I realized magic works best at night. I would like to think better of magic, seeing it happen in the full light of day. And it can happen that way, but magic prefers the night or at least the darkness of a dungeon, a cave, or the bottom of a well.
With that thought rolling around in my head, I found myself thumbing through Household Tales, when my eyes fell upon that strange name, “Rumpelstiltskin.”
In the Grimms’ version of this tale, the poor miller’s daughter is put in harm’s way—again as the motif will have it—by her father. This time he brags to the king that his daughter can spin straw into gold. The next day the girl is locked up by the king to perform this task before the morrow or die. Her life is at risk, not that of her false-worded father, who, having done his damage, exits the story.
Imprisoned in a room filled with straw and a spinning wheel, the girl, naturally, sits down to cry, when through the locked door comes a “manikin.” We are left to decide if this is a dwarf, imp, or elf. It offers to do the spinning for a price. The pattern is set for three nights running, the price escalating from a necklace, to a ring, then to her firstborn. The reward also moves from not being killed to marrying the king.
When payment comes due, the manikin reappears to collect the now queen’s firstborn son. Dickering ensues and, unaccountably, the manikin offers to relent if she can guess his name during the course of three days.
Before the third day ends, the queen’s servant, burdened with the task of collecting names, returns with the odd story of a little man dancing around a fire, reciting:
“To-day I bake, to-morrow brew,
The next I’ll have the young Queen’s child.
Ha! Glad am I that no one knew
That Rumpelstiltskin I am styled.”
The game is over, the queen has won, and Rumpelstiltskin, in a rage, tears himself in two, another of the Grimms’ messy endings.
Although the story does not say so, all of Rumpelstiltskin’s visits appear to occur in the evening. The story certainly states he worked all night spinning straw into gold. This story serves as a typical example of magic happening at night. One might also recall the night shift of the shoemaker’s elves, Cinderella’s magic evening out, the prince of “Kate Crackernut” forced by fairies to dance every night to the point of exhaustion.
Why at night?
Let us step back for a moment and view all of the fairy-tale landscape. Like churches sitting close to every village, magic appears in every fairy tale. If there is no magic, there is no fairy tale; a folk tale, perhaps, but not a fairy tale.
What kind of magic? Usually black magic. White magic is the stuff of charms and wearing of garlic to ward off evil—invoking, asking magic. Black magic, for good or ill, is used to spin straw into gold—evoking, commanding magic.
Now let us ask, why, historically, have we told stories of black magic to children? My answer is that it has nothing to do with the amusement of children. It has to do with the culture (church-dominated) wanting to diminish the reputation of black magic, along with its pagan associations. If relegated to children’s stories, it is no longer a thing to be taken seriously.
The process of diminishing through storytelling happened to Fionn mac Cumhaill, the larger-than-life pre-Christian Irish hero, who became reduced through Christian tellers to a bumbling giant given to sucking his thumb.
Fairy tales are a safe place for the culture to store magic. Still, it is not reputable and needs to be put, within the stories, in its proper place—in the dark, out of sight.
Fairy Tale of the Month: April 2012 Rumpelstiltskin – Part Two
The Plot Never Thickens
Fairy tales share common features with other written works of popular literature. Typically a good story has a beginning, middle, and end. There is a protagonist, hopefully a character with whom we can identify. Most popular fiction stories have a villain or something villainous. Other typical elements are the call to adventure, refusal of the call, crossing the threshold, road of trials, etc. (Go Google the hero’s journey and Joseph Campbell.)
There is one element in fairy tales that is not typically shared with other forms of popular fiction, not even fantasy. Fairy tales have holes in their plots you can fly a dragon through.
It is not uncommon for writers to take fairy tales as inspiration for novels, particularly young adult fantasy, Beauty, by Robin McKinley, being an example. One of the first tasks these writers face is the need to repair the plot so that it can sustain a work of novel length and complexity.
In “Rumpelstiltskin” let’s consider the scene between the manikin and the queen, when he comes to claim the child. I think we can safely assume he does not have a driving desire to take on responsibilities as a single parent. The closest we come to his intent is his statement: “…something living is more important to me than all the treasures in the world.” We are not told what he will do with the child, but we can guess it is nefarious.
What is his motive for inventing the guessing game? There is nothing in it to profit him. It delays by three days his acquisition of the child. Is there pity in his heart? That would be out of character. Perhaps he is playing with the queen, but, plotwise, that is weak motivation. I’d call it, in a novel, bad writing.
Let’s extrapolate a bit beyond the story’s actual plot. What happens, after the demise of Rumpelstiltskin, when the king says, “Dear, can you spin a little more gold?”
Actually, I’ve thought of a clever way around that dilemma for the queen. She would look at the king in feigned surprise and say, “My dear, only maidens can spin straw into gold. You and I have a son. He is your treasure.”
However, my self-proclaimed cleverness comes to nothing for solving this problem in our fairy tale. I am answering a question that doesn’t exist.
Here is my point. We don’t expect fairy tales to have good plots. We don’t ask them to have good plots. We may not want them to have good plots.
Fairy tales are “What if” stories, with tunnel vision, involving magic. What if you were asked—no, commanded—to spin straw into gold? That it cannot be done does not enter into consideration. All impossible tasks are accomplished in this genre. All sorts of conveniences are laid in the path of the protagonist. That servant of the queen just happened to hear the manikin singing his name as he danced around his fire.
“And they lived happily ever after.” Isn’t that a huge cliché to stick at the end of the plot? Yet it’s one that we expect to hear, and crave to hear, in our fairy tales.
We don’t want a reality check screwing up our fairy tales. Notice how the Grimms almost never put their stories in a given time or place. The only exception that comes to my mind is “The Bremen Town Musicians,” and those “musicians” never get to Bremen Town.
I believe the magic in fairy tales does not come from the turning of straw into gold, but rather being freed from the shackles of solid plot and believable motivations.
Fairy Tale of the Month: April 2012 Rumpelstiltskin – Part Three
John D. Batten
One needs to be careful when dealing with names that may evoke dark spirits. Craving to know the meaning behind a particularly mysterious name, I drew a white chalk circle on the floor around myself. Within its protection I cast the runes until they spelled out “Rumpelstiltskin.” (Well, actually, I tapped them out on the laptop.)
As I hoped, my command was answered by that benevolent spirit, Wiki, who, in a shimmering voice like warm vapors, patiently explained to this mere mortal the following:
“The name Rumpelstilzchen in German means literally “little rattle stilt.” (A stilt is a post or pole which provides support for a structure.) A rumpelstilt or rumpelstilz was the name of a type of goblin, also called a pophart or poppart that makes noises by rattling posts and rapping on planks. …. The ending “-chen” is a German diminutive and designates something as “little” or “dear,” depending on context.”
The meaning behind a name is interesting, but its power resides in the name itself. In evocative magic, if one knows the name of a demon, one can summon it and have it do one’s bidding. This is never a safe thing to do. Demons are dangerous, tricky beings. Any sorcerer who knows his craft will do his summoning standing within the protective confines of a pentacle (a five- pointed star within a circle drawn on the ground.)
In a number of cultures, individuals have a name by which they are known, but also have a secret true name, often given to them at puberty. To know that name is to have the power to cast charms over that person.
The contest between the queen and Rumpelstiltskin fell within the circle of a power struggle. The condition of the queen gaining control had always been there; the manikin simply made a game of it, never thinking she would find out his name through his own careless act of uttering it aloud. Then, rather than be controlled by the queen, he destroyed himself.
I sat in my chalk circle contemplating the nature of secret names long after the spirit of Wiki had faded. Did I have a secret name and not know it? Could some other entity discover it and henceforth control me?
No. We live in a modern civilized society, no longer given to superstitious constructions of reality that dictate the need for secret names to protect us from evil spirits or to control those same spirits. We have no need for secret names.
Then the full horror came to me. I have many secret names! My Social Security number, my PIN number, my Visa card number, and my computer password (letters and numbers), any of which can be discovered. My chalk circle is dust; it cannot protect me. With that many secret names, is it only time until one of them is revealed? Shall I tear myself in two and join Rumpelstiltskin?
I then understood how this tale relates to the modern world. Though written so long ago, it calls forth our present. “Rumpelstilskin” is the origin story of Identity Theft.
PS. While researching I found the Grimms’ oral collected version had Rumpelstiltskin traveling about riding in a cooking ladle, an image the Grimms edited out of their printed version. I am going to have to talk to Wilhelm about that the next time I see him.
10 thoughts on “Fairy Tale of the Month: April 2012 Rumpelstiltskin – Part One”
“To-day I bake, to-morrow brew,
The next I’ll have the young Queen’s child.
Ha! Glad am I that no one knew
That 444-55-6789 I am styled.”
a story in itself !
do we have a movie idea here? a modern day fairy tale?:)
Should Rumpelstiltskin be the protagonist or the antagonist in our movie?
and to take us to a space beyond the mind and logic….
Apr 29, 2012
and the tragedy of rumplestiltskin forgetting his own secret name😦 happens so often with me !
I thought I only had four names – birth name, legal name, storytelling name and a secret name – too much really. I had not counted on SS# or the various other ways I have been tagged in this society.
Charles, I collect and tell clothmaking tales; someday I hope to do an entire program of them and worksongs about spinning, weaving, etc. This month’s tale reminded me of two Scottish folktales, “Whuppity Stourie” and “Spin, Weave, Sew,” in which the heroine is required to a) spin the linen thread for her new husband’s shirts or be sent home in disgrace to her father; and b) the girl’s drunken father boasts that his daughter can not only do excellent spinning, weaving, and sewing shirts–but can do so in one night each. In the 1st, the wife happens upon 3 fairy spinsters, who offer to solve her dilemma if she invites them to dinner, and they do solve it. This is less about magic (unless you count the cobwebby bottles of wine they bring) than it is about the reality if married life after the honeymoon, compromise, and keeping one’s temper. In the 2nd, the father was among his friends at a pub, with no idea that a King’s guard overheard. When the King decides to hold a competition (prize being marriage to him), the father is truly horrified and contrite. His daughter is helped by her cat, who finds for her an enchanted spindle, shuttle and needle so that she can win. “Whuppity Stourie” to me is more about using cleverness in offering choices (would you rather have the thread for the traditional shirts, or would you rather have your beloved’s bonny smile?) and developing relationships. “Spin, Weave, Sew” is more about the lass’s kindness and basic industry being rewarded, and her willingness to use new materials to try to save her father’s standing. In a Cornish tale, “Cherry,” the girl’s mother boasts that her daughter is an excellent spinster, and is quite taken aback when the Squire carries her off to be his new servant. In time, he weds her, after she is helped by a devil, since she has no skill with the wheel or in knitting. But the problem comes when the devil demands payment or her finding his name, and she manages to find it by spying on a witch’s gathering. But part of the fun of the tale is that all the magic unravels, and the Squire, out hunting, rides along with his shirt, trousers, stockings, etc., literally falling from him–and she convinces him that it has nothing to do with her, that HE has been the one under enchantment. The devil is defeated, and she is free from the need to produce the thread, as the bride of “Whuppity Stourie” is. It seems to me that in more folk-y tales, the magic is almost incidental to the enjoyment of the tale. –Barra
P.S. Have you given any thought to the changing role of Rumpelstiltskin in the TV show, “Once Upon a Time”?
Actually, I haven’t seen “Once Upon a Time.” I’ve meant to, but I am so use to not watching TV I forget every Sunday. Is it out, or coming out, on DVD?
Black magic, magic that happens in the dark, in stories told in the dark, at bedtime, to children. Very interesting to think about. Other examples: the Twelve Dancing Princesses escaping with their princes at night, Vasalisa’s doll telling her “Morning is wiser than evening,” and, in a real child’s fairy tale, The Little Old Woman Who Lived in a Vinegar Bottle, the L.O.W. was visited by the fairy during the day, but had to wait until dark for the magic to happen.
Thank you for understanding the difference between invoking and evoking magic. In my experience both are powerful. Interesting that the Roman-Catholic church is responsible for for discrediting Pagan idols through manipulating fairy tales. It leaves me wondering which fairy tales are of Pagan origin and have been left intact.